Archery Addix banner

Sound like a good option (different cam)?

  • Stay with original cam

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Offer a more aggressive cam option (Cardiac style)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
490 Posts
I am too, just threw that out there because I am sure I am not the only one who has ever wondered.
I think the single cam is much more forgiving and easier to tune. Like I have said before, I cant think of much to improve on where Ross bows are concerned.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
210 Posts
From my understanding, the extra speed on the Cardiac isn't as a result of the cam, it's as a result of the difference in riser reflex and brace height.

Also, maybe I'm generalizing too much, but most of the guys shooting a bow with a 37" ata don't seem to be in the same group as the speed bow guys, so I'm not sure how much a few extra fps would mean to most of them, especially if it comes at the cost of anything that is currently so appealing about the 337.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
628 Posts
just the way it is ona 334 is just great for me. 10 feet ain't squat on 30 yard deer. BRU
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
thespyhunter said:
I am too, just threw that out there because I am sure I am not the only one who has ever wondered.
I think the single cam is much more forgiving and easier to tune. Like I have said before, I cant think of much to improve on where Ross bows are concerned.
Actually the way I see it the cam is probably 6-8 fps of the 320 the Cardiac has over the 334, and I am one of those 337 shooters. I'm not a speed freak or I would have selected a different bow. With that being said I would not turn down the 6-8 fps from a cam option that would allow me to shoot more KE too. I could shoot 24 to 32 more grains of arrow weight and maintain the same pin gaps.
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top